The Bigfoot Symbol We all know and love, is killing validation

Symbol absorption has had a profound impact on the Bigfoot research community. Most people in the Bigfoot research community don't even realize that they are "Symbol dependent"

Eyewitnesses that get a good look at the face of a Sasquatch invariably state that what they saw had "Human" facial features. The fact is... eyewitness descriptions are NOT being properly covered in any way on any of the documentaries that have had mainstream science participation. ALL of the programming that is available for review by any body with a television has been carefully crafted to ONLY compare Sasquatch to great apes, not the human-primates, but the actual "Ape". Clever narration and editing of interviews with scientists have enabled symbol saturation in the public's minds. It would be one thing if we were watching these shows and hearing objective narration, but if you re-watch this Programming, after you read this post, you will see things differently for the first time. This type of narration and editing is rampant in our programming about Bigfoot. Conditioning is real, and easily view-able if you take the time to see it for yourself. If you say evolutionary science is objective in their review of the subject, then why are they participating in what is obviously a campaign to assign and supplant the Idea that this unknown species is not HUMAN PRIMATE, but APE.

The general definition of programming for television is: To cause to absorb or incorporate automatic responses, attitudes, or the like; to condition.
Does this sound familiar? It sounds very similar to how you would train your dog, and it is.
“Hey, let’s watch that “program,” or “We now take you back to your regularly scheduled programming.” We have all made these statements and heard these statements being made by people on television.
These networks think so much of you and you’re level of awareness and intelligence that they don’t even try to hide what they are doing.
Through the science of semiotics Information is developed for television and it’s called programming.
“It’s actually your training for auto-response.”
It’s then aired for mass absorption in the population. In this way vast numbers of our population are conditioned to think and respond in pre-determined ways about whatever they are interested in.
In this “auto-response training” we watch about Bigfoot, we think we gain knowledge and a perspective on the subject.
We feel empowered as Ignorance seems to fade and awareness emerges; but only the awareness of the information that is provided.
If subjective or “Screened” information is in place when you view the programming, then you have a “Screened” awareness of the subject.
These “experts” that so diligently cover what the eyewitnesses say they saw and the witnesses themselves are in fact being used. Under the guise of having an opportunity to safely come forward with their encounter they do so. They are not the guilty parties but are in reality victims of the “Screen” that is implemented through the editing process that all the information undergoes before transmission.
It is always those with the financial resources and the motivation for control of the “funding” of these shows that are ultimately responsible for this perversion of the truth.
As a result of no ones ability to control the editing process, the reputations of those that are involved are tarnished sometimes.
As you will see this “programming” is diligently processed to meet the needs of the “Screen” that will be subconsciously reinforcing “specific terms” that are geared to generate the framework of the ideas in your mind about both the existence of the Bigfoot species and what it “could not be.”
Dramatism is a common semiotics based approach in programming that exaggerates the topic in the minds of the viewer giving the show itself a fantastic or surreal quality so you’ll tune in. “Monsters? It may be exciting, don’t miss it!”
The names of these “shows” are carefully selected from existing symbols to draw mass public interest in the topic. The use of existing auto-response symbol is common. For instance one of the most popular shows in the history of the Discovery Network of channels is “Monsterquest.” Millions of people are interested and fascinated by the Idea of monsters or the Idea of being terrified by a monster.
Repeats of this show air regularly on the History channel and H2, as if coverage on one channel wasn't enough. The name of this show infers that this program will be searching for monsters; you auto-response that this show is something right out of “science fiction.” subconsciously you associate Bigfoot with other made up or not real “Monsters,” and screen out any real possibility Bigfoot is real. All this is happening “subconsciously,” you are unaware or not conscious of this conditioning.
And it only continues with the title of the actual episode.
Show title: “The mystery of Ape Island”
Starting with the title of this particular episode of “Monsterquest,” Bigfoot is “Dehumanized” in the minds of the unaware and uneducated public. This enrages me when I see it happening and I’m sure others feel the same who have become aware of this.
The title of this show supports that there is a mysterious island somewhere and there are giant apes living on it, sound familiar? How about the fictional story of King Kong?”
This is another perfect example of the “Dehumanization” Screen in place.
And now…on with the show!
The following key words and phrases are listed in the order they are stated, you need only watch the show again to “consciously” see and hear all of this for yourself. These terms are repeated over and over again to enable the subconscious absorption of the “Dehumanization” of Sasquatch in the viewer’s minds.
“People claim to have seen monsters, science searches for answers on Monsterquest,” “The mystery of ape island”, “Vancouver Island,” “reports of a terrifying beast,” “the mystery of ape island,” “a large ape creature,” “ape-like creature,” “the monster,” “the beast,” “the creature,” “Sasquatch,” “Sasquatch,” “the creature,” “the creature,” “if hairy; no chance of being human,” “ape like creature,” “not human,” “no fossil trail,” “this thing,” “the creature,” “People claim to have seen monsters, science searches for answers on monsterquest,” “the legendary water ape,” “the monkey man,” “the beast,” “the hairy and ape-like creature,” “the beast,” (visual of giant human type track) “alleged” Sasquatch foot print, “not human tracks,” “monsterquest,” “the creature,” “hear animal sounds,” “monsterquest,” “human-type toes not human,” “monsterquest,” “water ape,” “terrorizing,” “expert analysis,” “human type tracks not human type,” “not known animal,” “is it human or ape other unknown ape,” “creature,” “creature,” “Sasquatch creature,” “monsterquest,” “mysterious water ape,” (witness says human like) (Narrator reapeats- “creature, creature, creature”) “Monsterquest” “science team,” “experts say,” “creature,” “creature,” “water ape,” “primates,” “swimming monkey,” “primate,” (eyewitness sketch of giant human with a lot of hair) “the creature,” “the creature,” “monsterquest,” “water ape,” “huge hairy creature,” “upright primate,” “expert analysis of footprints,” “beast,” “not human track,” “thing,” “creature,” “apes on Vancouver island,” “monsterquest,” “the creature is unknown species,” “beast does exist.”
Make sure to re-watch this show, if you do you can see, this particular piece of “Programming” has implemented a “Screen” that is designed to “Dehumanize,” remove, counter and dismiss any idea or possibility of the Bigfoot species being of the modern or pre-human-primate class, and subconsciously plant and reinforce the Idea in your mind that it’s a monster, a creature, a beast, or if it does by chance exist, it’s a giant hairy ape of the lower class; Possibly a relic of “Gigantopithicus.”
If you look even closer still you will see that the eyewitness interviews are cut in spots to aid in reinforcing the “screen,” with the exception of one; the eyewitness that describes what he saw as “Neanderthal” in appearance. Why?
There is no need to remove or edit that out of the show, it further supports another aspect of the screen in place and the evolutionary science that is behind developing the “Screen” that is being implemented.
If you examine the monsterquest “Programming Screen,” you can clearly see the motivation behind it, the developers of the show want you to think that the Sasquatch on Vancouver Island are probably Apes and not related to modern “homo-sapiens” in any way “if” they are real, but why?
One scientist even goes as far as to state and reinforce that “If it does have hair all over its body, it’s not human; it has to be an ape.” That’s a very bold and highly subjective “opinion,” given the fact that this individual has no interest in the subject, has never seen any evidence, or seen a Sasquatch with his own two eye’s.
This subjective comment is however understandable given his obvious “evolutionary” background and desire to insult people who "CLAIM" as they say to see the species.
One could easily make the argument that; eliminating the likelihood of the species being “Human-Primate” of the pre-human or Modern human class is not rational considering the nature of the evidence we have all seen, including our descriptions of the Bigfoot we saw.
“Having hair all over does not make Sasquatch or anything else “Ape” automatically.”
Especially when this is clearly not what any of the track casts show or what a witnesses that gets a real good look at Bigfoot or Sasquatch will tell you they saw; including me.
Again, what I saw was not Ape-like it was “human-like” in every way except covered in long grey hair, giant and much stronger and faster than any human could ever be. This does not mean that the species is human or part human, but when comparisons are given, shouldn't they be based on what is so obvious? Isn't this programming injecting theory that has no place in the situation in the first place? Why is this going on? Who is responsible? Why can't production companies that do cover the "Real" side of the evidence get their documentaries on these networks? All of this is easily view-able though it takes some effort and the necessary courage to face and absorb something very uncomfortable. People don't want to accept this information though as I say, all you have to do is look. It's a shame because if in the last ten years of Bigfoot programming they just told the truth about what is being seen and found, the people of this country would have joined us as a mass of upset Americans and we could have already realized the validation of this species here in America.
I am aware of the Hominae family that contains modern humans, pre-humans, and the "Real" apes. These Icons of Bigfoot research have very little room for discussion of "other" more obvious explanations for what the species is. Mainstream science has no respect for the public and even less respect for eyewitnesses that continue to contradict what they say, even though none of them have seen what we have. If you choose to begin to research "Semiotics" you will need to first understand that Symbol is not always visually represented or implemented and certainly at this point in the game where Bigfoot research is concerned, we are dealing more with the affects of symbol development from these cleverly designed programs. To the "Icons" of the so called scientific research of the Bigfoot species I say, complicity is most definitely consent, especially when you're paid for it. These intelligent people are fully aware of the biased efforts that have prevented mass public unity after all, it was created specifically to create a separation in belief and understanding.