"The plain truth is ridiculously obvious"

It's no secret that what we know so far about the species is entirely because the eyewitness and armchair un-official research community has carried the subject for many years. If you know anything about my research then you know that statement is true. I've said it before and here again is the disgusting fact of our very existence. "If science had done what they claim they are there to do, we would have verified this species existence decades ago, possibly centuries ago.
 Our reality as researchers and why we are here in this position trying to provide evidence to the same group of individuals that have shunned our like for many years is not a popular subject to discuss. I admit it, it's frustrating to have converstation about this, but it is a necessary part of the process of revealing past failers in scientific acceptance of our evidence and eyewitness accounts as valid. We have no support from mainstream science at its top levels because as of yet no one has confronted these people about any of this from our community.
This is not because what we saw wasn't real, as so many of our educated critics like to claim, but because as eyewitnesses and concerned people we are literally being victimized by scientific bias, and an agenda of disruptive disinformation. A campaign of very public, social and cyber bullying that rivals the worst examples of prejudicial, scientific bias in history and it will eventually go down as having been that when the species is finally validated. We've been telling the truth, your all wrong!
For all our considerable efforts to produce what "SCIENCE" and any of the other "SCOFFING JACKASSES" would supposedely consider "Irrefutable" proof of the species, as of yet, they claim, we have found nothing that would even tease science into serious investigation. How can this be? with thousands of people here in the U.S. and even more across the planet in other countries that have been witness to the species existence including me. I myself have found many tracks in the field that can only be attributed to some unverified species of giant being that leaves a human type track. I have seen that it is real!
There is no official funding for real scientific research from the Academies of science world wide because we are, ALL of us being victimized psychlogically into thinking we are somehow responsible for this and science is not. Until we break out of this dead end cycle we have been stuck in for decades and unite as one group that will not back down about this and we confront those that are resposible to validate new species, NOTHING WILL CHANGE. Most people are blissfully unaware that it's been over a hundred years here in the U.S. that the public has been looking into this with no help from science that we know of.
 I believe it's safe to say that science has thus far shown all of us they have no desire to listen.

 That's why I started the Bigfoot Research Council, with the goal to confront science at its top levels and get research into the species the official funding it deserves. The goal here is to first confront the subjective terminology that has held us at bay so long and introduce new terminology that is more respectful. This would open up a respectful line of communication in the isssue.
(SEE-"Terms of your surrender" and other pertinent posts here on the journal for more info on the current terminology that is killing us)

Self evaluation is the key;
Why am I forced to seek answers about this when I am not a scientist to begin with?
Who should be looking into this for all the Americans who say that they have seen this species?
Why aren't they doing it?
How can I help change this?

These are the right questions to ask yourself. Here is a video from 3 years ago when I filed a petition with the white house to look into the eyewitness statements. I have actively pursued official recognition for this species for a very long time. We all know they know, it's time to force the issue!

                                     
https://www.booster.com/comperiorealis?beta=true
 

Not Your Ordinary Bigfoot Blog

Yes, we research Bigfoot in the field and have for years, but that research resulted in finding evidence of the species, interaction between my team and them, and two separate sightings. We know it's real, having seen two different types here in Florida with our own two eyes. Belief doesn't even enter into the equation any more, we know. Do you? If you do "know" then get involved in helping us to unite this research community to confront scientific denial of the species. Get involved or Donate a buck or two to help us get science to show this subject the level of respect it deserves. Ultimately, we are not the only human type being here on earth, what could be more important to study!

If you read through the posts on this blog you will begin to get the picture.  Help the Bigfoot Research Council to do what needs to be done about this: click the link and donate today!

Science is Waiting for you to SPEAK UP!

Our project has an important goal. We want to get full scale scientific involvement in research.
The funding that goes to snail research is obscene here is an example of how funds are prioritized and distributed for "Worthwhile" research? Click link and enjoy the irony that you encourage by not getting involved in this serious campaign to confront these organizations into funding what should be the most important discovery in history! Here ya go $880,000.00 to watch snails have sex?
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/feds-spending-880000-study-benefits-snail-sex

Help us Help you, Donate today and get involved in changing Bigfoot research for good!

http://bigfootresearchersunited.blogspot.com/2014/10/help-bigfoot-research-council-get.html

Enjoy the ride guys!

"Why do we need to confront science about official Bigfoot research funding?"

Help us to help you today! click the link below and donate so we can get real research funded

https://www.booster.com/comperiorealis?beta=true

I had a conversation a few years ago at work with a co-worker who asked me about my research. He said he was just curious. I weighed his approach and evaluated my past involvement in conversations with him. I agreed to tell him and as I tried to give him a basic understanding about what I saw and what I have experienced, he looked stunned at first, then I could see the doubt flow into his eyes, it suddenly occurred to me that this person had absolutely no idea what was running around out in the swampy wilderness just a few miles from his house. As the conversation ended I took a few "Skeptical" shots across the bow, shook them off and when I got home that day set about finding answers to how it is that so many people have no Idea that this species is real. In this blog you will see all of my field research and experiences in great detail taken directly from my field journals as my research unfolded in real time. You will see the actual trail I followed to explain why this community exists and the real reasons why our research community chose to go try to prove this FOR science instead of confronting science about investigation into this FOR us. None of the "reasoning" that our community has for the lack of scientific involvement and funding for research is reasonable justification for the disrespect we continue to endure. I refuse to comment or participate in any more conversation that involves our research community "PROVING" Bigfoot is real FOR a Scientific community that could do in weeks what we've tried to do in decades and end this debate once and for all.
Not withstanding the obvious explanations for why it's so difficult to acquire solid evidence for the species i.e: Their size, speed, power and having evolved in the environments we really struggle in when we choose enter them, there was a less obvious answer that no one was really getting into-science has failed us.
There is an obvious resistance to look into this subject for all the people that have seen it that science as a whole has demonstrated for over a hundred years. Most of the time in fact and to this very day, when you read comments from scientists about this subject it is more about the armchair research community than it is about the species. They use the community to symbolize and justify not looking into it when the reality is that we only exist because of what we know and more importantly -the fact that they have created a conflict of information by denying the possibility that the species is real in the first place. Who are you to tell me I didn't just see what I so obviously saw, however incredible it may seem. I know what I saw.

At this stage in the game with so many Americans that have witnessed first hand that this is a real flesh and blood being, including myself...the resistance science is still showing all of us has to be considered disrespect. As Americans and as people who have seen this species, our sightings and descriptions of what we have observed deserve more respect from everyone, especially our scientific community. Yet here we are, a hundred years and counting having the same stupid debates all over the planet about what we saw with people who don't have a leg to stand on because they were not there to see what we saw. Science is unwilling to acknowledge our experiences and begin serious investigation into all these witness statements. 
Science has assumed the responsibility of explaining all of the creatures of this planet, they can look into this and the fact is...they haven't. Why? 
This is why the public is unable to act on what is so obviously the most important discovery ever made by human kind.  This is why there is a stigma attached to eyewitness statements before they are ever heard and this is why to this very day, we argue with each other night and day about every aspect of this subject. We have no real science or data that has been validated by the controlling scientific monarchy, the people that have control over validation of scientific data.
We are repeatedly shot down as eyewitnesses and researchers, the tracks we find are considered "Alleged" and all samples of hair or DNA continue to come back as either human or some arbitrary species. We may have been told the truth about what the sample turned out to be...HUMAN. They appear to be at least part human yet science repeatedly "CLAIMS" the sample was contaminated without ever completing the examination process- IDENTIFY THE CONTAMINANT AND TELL US WHAT IT IS-SEPARATE THE CONTAMINANT FROM THE RESPECTIVE DNA AND RETEST IT. 
We have not been successful thus far in working together with science because science is not working with us yet. I believe that If we draw our numbers together and unite as a mass of very serious individuals who will not back off and have every intention of making sciences disrespectful attitude toward the eyewitnesses, the tracks and the research community, make it a public event, where the entire country can see what is really going on for the first time....we will begin to get results. Maybe it will take a few tries, but if they do turn down our requests at first, the public will then come to our aid. People want to know once and for all if what we have been saying as eyewitnesses and researchers is true. 
Here is one Academic who is very interested in helping our community but can not get it done because science has behaved unscientifically for over a hundred years about what we all know is real!

Contact me at bigfootresearchersunited@gmail.com
Donate to our campaign to get this done! Click link below
https://www.booster.com/comperiorealis?beta=true

15 Years of faithful Bigfoot investigation!

Help us to help you today! Click the link below or at the bottom of the page to donate and contribute to getting science to fund real research for the first time ever

https://www.booster.com/comperiorealis?beta=true

So, today is my Birthday, but I want to give you a gift.
Another year has passed and I've learned a lot about what I saw that day and even more about what is actually preventing the validation of what I saw that day.
Again, I say it's got nothing to do with "Bigfoot" or it being "elusive" or any of the other typical excuses we hear every day for why there is supposedly no evidence that the species exists. I just told you it is real, and so have thousands of other people. It has to do with me, and you, the Bigfoot eyewitnesses, the researchers, the public.
Here is my gift to you, the research community-
These words that follow this sentence should be investigated thoroughly in how they apply to you, to us, and to our perceptions both past and present about this subject. Because understanding how these words and phrases have effected our thinking is the key to unlocking the truth about "Why" we think what we think about our subject and "Why" we say and do the things we do or really...don't do the things we should, to press forward in the right directions for validation of the species. Understanding our own minds and the certain "Map-able" consistencies of our symbol responsive consciousness is the key to recognizing the arbitrary, subliminally induced cages that have held us all for decades, and that we are blissfully unaware of. In the last three years I have repeatedly tried to convey this and other information in order to provide explanations for why nothing is being done officially to validate our experiences, sightings and what we all know in this research community is really real. All of these "Terms" are clues, or crumbs that led me to solution oriented thinking on our subject. 

"Semiotics and Human Consciousness"
"Understanding the application of semiotic studies in television programming"
"Applications of Semiotics in Programming and Politics"
"Terminology"
"Terministic screens"
"Symbol implementation"
"Symbol dependence"
"Programming"
"Objective Evaluation"
"Subjective Evaluation"
"Activism"
"Social Programming"
"Cultural Programming"
"Mass Cultural Programming"

Semiotics is the study of human consciousness and awareness, and of the signs of what our consciousness responds to most. To that extent, that in and of itself is of no value, until the findings of semioticis studies are then implemented in mass programming, whatever media, to suit a predetermined agenda. When that occurs I liken it's effects to an invisible atomic bomb being used on us without our knowledge, for it has effected mankind as negatively. We have all been victimized by those who use this information for their own gain, in many ways and until you become aware that semiotics exists, you literally have a lot of help making up your mind about a great many things without you even knowing it's going on. The keys to the kingdom of all human consciousness are in the hands of the few who could care less if your truly free or not. Free your mind, it's worth your time!

Help us help you click the link below and get involved today!

https://www.booster.com/comperiorealis?beta=true

"The Terms of the Surrender of Your Common Sense"

Help us to help you today! Click the link and donate a buck or two to get real funding for research

https://www.booster.com/comperiorealis?beta=true

Science needs to do their job and officially fund Bigfoot research.
You might think upon reading the title of this post that this subject has nothing to do with Bigfoot or you your self, but if you are a real flesh and blood person, and you live here in the programming capital of the world, "AMERICA" you are in need of a common sense tune up by way of a few very important pieces of information. If you are like me, you may already be aware that there is something seriously wrong going on in Bigfoot research, and it's got nothing to do with Bigfoot itself.

Here are some of the "TERMS" that have manipulated you into a cycle that repeats itself and goes nowhere. You have accepted all of this over time and surrendered your common sense for active symbol dependence.

Terminology that precludes all scientific findings, physical evidence and rational conclusion from the start- 
"Crypto-zoology"-The Search for Hidden Animals or elusive zoological specimens has been defined by many mainstream scientists as-
"A pseudo-science." or "False Science." 
Wrong, the discovery of new and well hidden as of yet uncatalogued species is a well funded mainstream scientific activity. The implementation of the term "Pseudo-science" has influenced public opinion on the validity of our research before it ever began, when the reality is- many species were very difficult to find and evaded scientific discovery for decades in the field. Make no mistake "Crypto-zoology" is a funded and well documented activity in scientific zoological circles. They just don't call it crypto-zoology, when the unofficially educated do it it's called crypto-zoology, when science looks for hidden specimens its called legitimate research.
We need to get these same individuals, the "legitimate research community" that term our research "invalid" to do what they call "Legitimate Research" into our subject matter.
 It wasn't that difficult for me to find evidence of the speicies in the field in the form of abnormally large human type tracks, and within a short time have a close encounter of my own and eventually a sighting at a short distance.
 It should be nothing for the army of well funded scientists that are currently studying "LESS IMPORTANT" aspects of our reality here on earth to validate this species but they haven't even flinched over what should represent the most significant realization in the history of mankind, we are not alone on earth as the only species of human type being. If you doubt that, look at a Bigfoot track or speak to an eyewitness who got a real good look.
They-(SCIENCE) cant have it both ways, this flagrant misuse of terminology and presumed authority has to be confronted in order to bring about change.

Terminology that keeps you off sciences back about Bigfoot and out trying to do what they should be doing-
"THE BURDEN OF PROOF"
Somehow in spite of the fact that science has labeled the entire Crypto-Zoological community as "Pseudo-Scientists" and done nothing but call "BIGFOOTERS" crazy, or even try to fire or deny advancement to their own kind who try to look into the subject with a serious eye-
There exists a firm belief in the minds of most of our crypto-zoological and Bigfoot research community that science can be trusted and WE the "Pseudo-Scientists" should go prove that the Bigfoot species is real FOR them. HA! That was a good trick! and many, many people all over the planet have bought a full subscription to that one, including...for a time, me.

 BUT, how has this gone on so long? and how is it being maintained when so many eyewitnesses and researchers are interested in the validation of the species?
One way is by getting you to think that you have to prove what you say you saw was real. By the implementation of simple and very clever word usage. "TERMINOLOGY"

The TERM "BURDEN OF PROOF" IS A LEGAL TERM NOT A SCIENTIFIC TERM. Yet somehow every body just buys into it because it has been thrown around by people for years.
We have all heard this statement:
"A man Claims to have seen the legendary Creature known as Bigfoot!" The implimentation of Clever psychological primer words like "Claims" or "allegedly" are the norm in the terminology we hear indeed.
Why not just say "A man says he saw a Bigfoot?"
"This is where, this is when, this is what he says he saw."
Is this a legal case? Why is the man who saw the Bigfoot being "Put On Trial" by terminology. Look for the use of these words whenever you watch anything to do with Bigfoot on television. You will be surprised how many times you are led to doubts by this kind of terminology.

There are underlying reinforcing measures going on all over the internet keeping you thinking you are unscientific and need to follow protocols to collect evidence. This is a great Idea, if we already had someone to take our evidence too, but we don't.

There are even groups on social media that by nature of what they advertise and what you see, ask you to join or promote membership as joining other researchers or interested parties, they then show that they are trying to reinforce the belief that most of our community of researchers are morons and all of our sightings and evidence amounts to nothing. They repeatedly claim eyewitnesses are not reliable, which in my opinion is not the case when considering the traumatic and controversial nature of what a sighting truly represents to eyewitnesses, I mean, I cant ever forget what I saw! That's what a sighting really is!
I have studied these groups and many individuals in these groups by way of confrontational interaction and If you take the time to see what they invariable do to our research community, they promote dependence on the same scientific community that is clearly "NOT" showing any of us an ounce of respect as eyewitnesses and researchers. They prey upon the fears of many about how we are not being taken seriously by science, and claim it's because we are unscientific in our research methods, NO SHIT, Most of us aren't scientists, and the fact is neither are they!
 They tear apart anybody that offers a contradictory opinion on what they say about anything and everything, and most importantly for all of us to notice: WHEN PRESENTED WITH A SIMPLE SOLUTION INVOLVING SIGNING YOUR NAME IN A CAMPAIGN TO ASK FOR OFFICIAL FUNDING, AND TRUE UNIFICATION OF THIS RESEARCH COMMUNITY, THEY MOCKED THE IDEA IN EVERY WAY BY GIVING AN ABUNDANCE OF REASONS FOR WHY I WAS WAY OFF IN MY THINKING AND HOW SCIENCE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO LOOK INTO THIS.
 AS IT TURNS OUT SOME OF THE CONTRIBUTORS TO THE GROUPS I WENT INTO TO INVESTIGATE ARE FULL OF PEOPLE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE BIGFOOT IS REAL, AND THAT CLEARLY HAVE AN AGENDA INVOLVING THE DERAILMENT OF ANY SERIOUS EFFORTS TO BRING THE TRUTH TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. IF YOU DOUBT THIS TRY DOING THE AMOUNT OF RESEARCH I HAVE INTO THIS AND YOU WILL SEE I AM CORRECT. 
We must begin to identify what these real diversions are causing us. The promotion of  scientific dependence is not the solution to our problems. Promoting that eyewitnesses are responsible to prove this and that we carry the "BURDEN OF PROOF" has already been counterproductive for many decades. THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE BLINDED TO THESE FACTS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT SOLUTION ORIENTED, THEY ARE CHAOS ORIENTED.
 "NOT" seeking funding and active investigation from science as a whole is literally the Cause of all of this. SCIENCE -They lay the burrden of Proof" on what They Openly Call a FALSE SCIENCE, US... and they themselves are funding the discoveries of new elusive primates every year. Your evidence is invalid, not because it is invalid or not real, but because they did not find it in the first place. If you disagree with this you need to do more research on the matter, I have and as a result I am not Symbol or socially dependent.
Science can not have it both ways, this Flagrant misuse of presumed authority will be confronted.

Take a few minutes to think on the ridiculous implications of the paragraph above. This is the foundation of the dissolution of all the evidence we find and the primary cause of the cycle this research community is stuck in that has lasted for over 60 years. A symbol has been created to represent all of our evidence as "NOT REAL"

Terminology that precludes eyewitness statements
"Anecdotal?"
While science funds expeditions to catalog new species every year with these efforts grounded in slim or anecdotal evidence in the first place, the evidence for Bigfoot is "derogatorily termed" "Anecdotal" Like "Anecdotal" reference is never pursued and new species have never been found as a direct result of anecdotal evidence. For that matter, ALL science is anecdotal until it is proven. Go ahead, disagree with that, why would you in the first place, are you defending the same entity that is belittling you? are you symbol dependent? Do you blindly seek to say "here, see...It's real we told you!"
Like a dependent child, or are you an intelligent fully grown American?
Examine your self and our prior attempts as eyewitnesses and researchers and you'll find that this term has precluded the possibility of you being reliable or truthful in the descriptions of what you saw and what we all continue to say to the scientific community.
They can not have it both ways, this flagrant misuse of "Terminology" and presumed authority will be confronted

Mis-Identification- 
REALLY? DON'T EVEN GO THERE!
Hallucination-  REALLY?
Don't even go there!

Symbols that make you think science as a whole is really interested in validation of what you know is real...Bigfoot -
Science searches for answers..on Monsterquest-all Bigfoot episodes are riddled with terminology that precludes validity despite the general serious tone of the show.
Finding Bigfoot, or As I like to call "Not Finding Bigfoot"
Ancient Aliens, the Bigfoot episode
Sasquatch, legend meets science
Bigfoot, the definitive guide 
10,000,000 Dollar Bigfoot Bounty

These are a few examples of the programming you have viewed, but what have you absorbed psychologically by watching these shows? If you go back and watch them carefully you will see that they are all "Terministically Screened" to implement the Idea that Bigfoot is probably or most likely an ape of the non-human classification. Well, I am an eyewitness and I saw human facial features, yes his face was pre-human like, but definitely not ape-like.

Here are the symbols that make you think science is really trying to do something about validating Bigfoot when the reality is....they have no support from their colleagues and in fact are or have been in danger of losing their jobs because they chose to look into Bigfoot.

Jeff Meldrum....almost fired...University staff demanded he be stripped of tenure years ago
John Bindernagal...almost fired over Bigfoot research
Grover Crantz...almost fired...denied tenure
Ivan Sanderson...almost fired...denied tenure
The list goes on and on.
These people need our help and as of yet the research community has not addressed the real issues that are preventing real scientific investigation of the species, the very real suppressive bias that we are all subject to, especially a scientist that looks into Bigfoot. Haven't you ever wondered why nothing has been done about this? Well, it's because we have all absorbed these false symbols and they have rendered our community incapable of rational evaluation and action against the real responsible parties, mainstream science. Scientific Accountability to the American people needs to become a reality, and we want to help make that happen.

We cannot have scientists that are unscientific and biased ruining the careers of those scientists that are trying to be objective and examine the existence of this species. Quite frankly if you disagree with that, you should probably quit Bigfoot research altogether.

This extortive, unscientific denial and abuse of presumed authority will be confronted, they cannot have it both ways.
You may think that we need scientists to help us to confront science, and I believe that too...right now we have a Field Biologist and an Anthropologist, and 3 police officers who are all eyewitnesses including the scientists. Plain talk is how we will get this done.

http://bigfootresearchersunited.blogspot.com/2014/10/help-bigfoot-research-council-get.html

John Bindernagal on Bigfoot skepticism and how it has and is currently "Effecting" Validation of the species

Help us to help you!

http://bigfootresearchersunited.blogspot.com/2014/10/help-bigfoot-research-council-get.html

Don't just take my word on why we need to unify as researchers and eyewitnesses to confront science about this, here is an example of why we need to unite and confront the rest of mainstream science about this very serious and important issue. Those few mainstream scientists that know it's real need our help!

You want to wait another hundred years to confront this scientific denial? Get off your asses and get involved in the project, these guys need our help! Donate today and help us to help you!
https://www.booster.com/comperiorealis?beta=true

The Bigfoot Symbol We all know and love, is killing validation

Symbol absorption has had a profound impact on the Bigfoot research community. Most people in the Bigfoot research community don't even realize that they are "Symbol dependent"

Eyewitnesses that get a good look at the face of a Sasquatch invariably state that what they saw had "Human" facial features. The fact is... eyewitness descriptions are NOT being properly covered in any way on any of the documentaries that have had mainstream science participation. ALL of the programming that is available for review by any body with a television has been carefully crafted to ONLY compare Sasquatch to great apes, not the human-primates, but the actual "Ape". Clever narration and editing of interviews with scientists have enabled symbol saturation in the public's minds. It would be one thing if we were watching these shows and hearing objective narration, but if you re-watch this Programming, after you read this post, you will see things differently for the first time. This type of narration and editing is rampant in our programming about Bigfoot. Conditioning is real, and easily view-able if you take the time to see it for yourself. If you say evolutionary science is objective in their review of the subject, then why are they participating in what is obviously a campaign to assign and supplant the Idea that this unknown species is not HUMAN PRIMATE, but APE.

The general definition of programming for television is: To cause to absorb or incorporate automatic responses, attitudes, or the like; to condition.
Does this sound familiar? It sounds very similar to how you would train your dog, and it is.
“Hey, let’s watch that “program,” or “We now take you back to your regularly scheduled programming.” We have all made these statements and heard these statements being made by people on television.
These networks think so much of you and you’re level of awareness and intelligence that they don’t even try to hide what they are doing.
Through the science of semiotics Information is developed for television and it’s called programming.
“It’s actually your training for auto-response.”
It’s then aired for mass absorption in the population. In this way vast numbers of our population are conditioned to think and respond in pre-determined ways about whatever they are interested in.
In this “auto-response training” we watch about Bigfoot, we think we gain knowledge and a perspective on the subject.
We feel empowered as Ignorance seems to fade and awareness emerges; but only the awareness of the information that is provided.
If subjective or “Screened” information is in place when you view the programming, then you have a “Screened” awareness of the subject.
These “experts” that so diligently cover what the eyewitnesses say they saw and the witnesses themselves are in fact being used. Under the guise of having an opportunity to safely come forward with their encounter they do so. They are not the guilty parties but are in reality victims of the “Screen” that is implemented through the editing process that all the information undergoes before transmission.
It is always those with the financial resources and the motivation for control of the “funding” of these shows that are ultimately responsible for this perversion of the truth.
As a result of no ones ability to control the editing process, the reputations of those that are involved are tarnished sometimes.
As you will see this “programming” is diligently processed to meet the needs of the “Screen” that will be subconsciously reinforcing “specific terms” that are geared to generate the framework of the ideas in your mind about both the existence of the Bigfoot species and what it “could not be.”
Dramatism is a common semiotics based approach in programming that exaggerates the topic in the minds of the viewer giving the show itself a fantastic or surreal quality so you’ll tune in. “Monsters? It may be exciting, don’t miss it!”
The names of these “shows” are carefully selected from existing symbols to draw mass public interest in the topic. The use of existing auto-response symbol is common. For instance one of the most popular shows in the history of the Discovery Network of channels is “Monsterquest.” Millions of people are interested and fascinated by the Idea of monsters or the Idea of being terrified by a monster.
Repeats of this show air regularly on the History channel and H2, as if coverage on one channel wasn't enough. The name of this show infers that this program will be searching for monsters; you auto-response that this show is something right out of “science fiction.” subconsciously you associate Bigfoot with other made up or not real “Monsters,” and screen out any real possibility Bigfoot is real. All this is happening “subconsciously,” you are unaware or not conscious of this conditioning.
And it only continues with the title of the actual episode.
Show title: “The mystery of Ape Island”
Starting with the title of this particular episode of “Monsterquest,” Bigfoot is “Dehumanized” in the minds of the unaware and uneducated public. This enrages me when I see it happening and I’m sure others feel the same who have become aware of this.
The title of this show supports that there is a mysterious island somewhere and there are giant apes living on it, sound familiar? How about the fictional story of King Kong?”
This is another perfect example of the “Dehumanization” Screen in place.
And now…on with the show!
The following key words and phrases are listed in the order they are stated, you need only watch the show again to “consciously” see and hear all of this for yourself. These terms are repeated over and over again to enable the subconscious absorption of the “Dehumanization” of Sasquatch in the viewer’s minds.
“People claim to have seen monsters, science searches for answers on Monsterquest,” “The mystery of ape island”, “Vancouver Island,” “reports of a terrifying beast,” “the mystery of ape island,” “a large ape creature,” “ape-like creature,” “the monster,” “the beast,” “the creature,” “Sasquatch,” “Sasquatch,” “the creature,” “the creature,” “if hairy; no chance of being human,” “ape like creature,” “not human,” “no fossil trail,” “this thing,” “the creature,” “People claim to have seen monsters, science searches for answers on monsterquest,” “the legendary water ape,” “the monkey man,” “the beast,” “the hairy and ape-like creature,” “the beast,” (visual of giant human type track) “alleged” Sasquatch foot print, “not human tracks,” “monsterquest,” “the creature,” “hear animal sounds,” “monsterquest,” “human-type toes not human,” “monsterquest,” “water ape,” “terrorizing,” “expert analysis,” “human type tracks not human type,” “not known animal,” “is it human or ape other unknown ape,” “creature,” “creature,” “Sasquatch creature,” “monsterquest,” “mysterious water ape,” (witness says human like) (Narrator reapeats- “creature, creature, creature”) “Monsterquest” “science team,” “experts say,” “creature,” “creature,” “water ape,” “primates,” “swimming monkey,” “primate,” (eyewitness sketch of giant human with a lot of hair) “the creature,” “the creature,” “monsterquest,” “water ape,” “huge hairy creature,” “upright primate,” “expert analysis of footprints,” “beast,” “not human track,” “thing,” “creature,” “apes on Vancouver island,” “monsterquest,” “the creature is unknown species,” “beast does exist.”
Make sure to re-watch this show, if you do you can see, this particular piece of “Programming” has implemented a “Screen” that is designed to “Dehumanize,” remove, counter and dismiss any idea or possibility of the Bigfoot species being of the modern or pre-human-primate class, and subconsciously plant and reinforce the Idea in your mind that it’s a monster, a creature, a beast, or if it does by chance exist, it’s a giant hairy ape of the lower class; Possibly a relic of “Gigantopithicus.”
If you look even closer still you will see that the eyewitness interviews are cut in spots to aid in reinforcing the “screen,” with the exception of one; the eyewitness that describes what he saw as “Neanderthal” in appearance. Why?
There is no need to remove or edit that out of the show, it further supports another aspect of the screen in place and the evolutionary science that is behind developing the “Screen” that is being implemented.
If you examine the monsterquest “Programming Screen,” you can clearly see the motivation behind it, the developers of the show want you to think that the Sasquatch on Vancouver Island are probably Apes and not related to modern “homo-sapiens” in any way “if” they are real, but why?
One scientist even goes as far as to state and reinforce that “If it does have hair all over its body, it’s not human; it has to be an ape.” That’s a very bold and highly subjective “opinion,” given the fact that this individual has no interest in the subject, has never seen any evidence, or seen a Sasquatch with his own two eye’s.
This subjective comment is however understandable given his obvious “evolutionary” background and desire to insult people who "CLAIM" as they say to see the species.
One could easily make the argument that; eliminating the likelihood of the species being “Human-Primate” of the pre-human or Modern human class is not rational considering the nature of the evidence we have all seen, including our descriptions of the Bigfoot we saw.
“Having hair all over does not make Sasquatch or anything else “Ape” automatically.”
Especially when this is clearly not what any of the track casts show or what a witnesses that gets a real good look at Bigfoot or Sasquatch will tell you they saw; including me.
Again, what I saw was not Ape-like it was “human-like” in every way except covered in long grey hair, giant and much stronger and faster than any human could ever be. This does not mean that the species is human or part human, but when comparisons are given, shouldn't they be based on what is so obvious? Isn't this programming injecting theory that has no place in the situation in the first place? Why is this going on? Who is responsible? Why can't production companies that do cover the "Real" side of the evidence get their documentaries on these networks? All of this is easily view-able though it takes some effort and the necessary courage to face and absorb something very uncomfortable. People don't want to accept this information though as I say, all you have to do is look. It's a shame because if in the last ten years of Bigfoot programming they just told the truth about what is being seen and found, the people of this country would have joined us as a mass of upset Americans and we could have already realized the validation of this species here in America.
I am aware of the Hominae family that contains modern humans, pre-humans, and the "Real" apes. These Icons of Bigfoot research have very little room for discussion of "other" more obvious explanations for what the species is. Mainstream science has no respect for the public and even less respect for eyewitnesses that continue to contradict what they say, even though none of them have seen what we have. If you choose to begin to research "Semiotics" you will need to first understand that Symbol is not always visually represented or implemented and certainly at this point in the game where Bigfoot research is concerned, we are dealing more with the affects of symbol development from these cleverly designed programs. To the "Icons" of the so called scientific research of the Bigfoot species I say, complicity is most definitely consent, especially when you're paid for it. These intelligent people are fully aware of the biased efforts that have prevented mass public unity after all, it was created specifically to create a separation in belief and understanding.

"Who" Indeed

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.