Science needs to do their job and officially fund Bigfoot research.
You might think upon reading the title of this post that this subject has nothing to do with Bigfoot or you your self, but if you are a real flesh and blood person, and you live here in the programming capital of the world, "AMERICA" you are in need of a common sense tune up by way of a few very important pieces of information. If you are like me, you may already be aware that there is something seriously wrong going on in Bigfoot research, and it's got nothing to do with Bigfoot itself.
Here are some of the "TERMS" that have manipulated you into a cycle that repeats itself and goes nowhere. You have accepted all of this over time and surrendered your common sense for active symbol dependence.
Terminology that precludes all scientific findings, physical evidence and rational conclusion from the start-
"Crypto-zoology"-The Search for Hidden Animals or elusive zoological specimens has been defined by many mainstream scientists as-
"A pseudo-science." or "False Science."
Wrong, the discovery of new and well hidden as of yet uncatalogued species is a well funded mainstream scientific activity. The implementation of the term "Pseudo-science" has influenced public opinion on the validity of our research before it ever began, when the reality is- many species were very difficult to find and evaded scientific discovery for decades in the field. Make no mistake "Crypto-zoology" is a funded and well documented activity in scientific zoological circles. They just don't call it crypto-zoology, when the unofficially educated do it it's called crypto-zoology, when science looks for hidden specimens its called legitimate research.
We need to get these same individuals, the "legitimate research community" that term our research "invalid" to do what they call "Legitimate Research" into our subject matter.
It wasn't that difficult for me to find evidence of the speicies in the field in the form of abnormally large human type tracks, and within a short time have a close encounter of my own and eventually a sighting at a short distance.
It should be nothing for the army of well funded scientists that are currently studying "LESS IMPORTANT" aspects of our reality here on earth to validate this species but they haven't even flinched over what should represent the most significant realization in the history of mankind, we are not alone on earth as the only species of human type being. If you doubt that, look at a Bigfoot track or speak to an eyewitness who got a real good look.
They-(SCIENCE) cant have it both ways, this flagrant misuse of terminology and presumed authority has to be confronted in order to bring about change.
Terminology that keeps you off sciences back about Bigfoot and out trying to do what they should be doing-
"THE BURDEN OF PROOF"
Somehow in spite of the fact that science has labeled the entire Crypto-Zoological community as "Pseudo-Scientists" and done nothing but call "BIGFOOTERS" crazy, or even try to fire or deny advancement to their own kind who try to look into the subject with a serious eye-
There exists a firm belief in the minds of most of our crypto-zoological and Bigfoot research community that science can be trusted and WE the "Pseudo-Scientists" should go prove that the Bigfoot species is real FOR them. HA! That was a good trick! and many, many people all over the planet have bought a full subscription to that one, including...for a time, me.
BUT, how has this gone on so long? and how is it being maintained when so many eyewitnesses and researchers are interested in the validation of the species?
One way is by getting you to think that you have to prove what you say you saw was real. By the implementation of simple and very clever word usage. "TERMINOLOGY"
The TERM "BURDEN OF PROOF" IS A LEGAL TERM NOT A SCIENTIFIC TERM. Yet somehow every body just buys into it because it has been thrown around by people for years.
We have all heard this statement:
"A man Claims to have seen the legendary Creature known as Bigfoot!" The implimentation of Clever psychological primer words like "Claims" or "allegedly" are the norm in the terminology we hear indeed.
Why not just say "A man says he saw a Bigfoot?"
"This is where, this is when, this is what he says he saw."
Is this a legal case? Why is the man who saw the Bigfoot being "Put On Trial" by terminology. Look for the use of these words whenever you watch anything to do with Bigfoot on television. You will be surprised how many times you are led to doubts by this kind of terminology.
There are underlying reinforcing measures going on all over the internet keeping you thinking you are unscientific and need to follow protocols to collect evidence. This is a great Idea, if we already had someone to take our evidence too, but we don't.
There are even groups on social media that by nature of what they advertise and what you see, ask you to join or promote membership as joining other researchers or interested parties, they then show that they are trying to reinforce the belief that most of our community of researchers are morons and all of our sightings and evidence amounts to nothing. They repeatedly claim eyewitnesses are not reliable, which in my opinion is not the case when considering the traumatic and controversial nature of what a sighting truly represents to eyewitnesses, I mean, I cant ever forget what I saw! That's what a sighting really is!
I have studied these groups and many individuals in these groups by way of confrontational interaction and If you take the time to see what they invariable do to our research community, they promote dependence on the same scientific community that is clearly "NOT" showing any of us an ounce of respect as eyewitnesses and researchers. They prey upon the fears of many about how we are not being taken seriously by science, and claim it's because we are unscientific in our research methods, NO SHIT, Most of us aren't scientists, and the fact is neither are they!
They tear apart anybody that offers a contradictory opinion on what they say about anything and everything, and most importantly for all of us to notice: WHEN PRESENTED WITH A SIMPLE SOLUTION INVOLVING SIGNING YOUR NAME IN A CAMPAIGN TO ASK FOR OFFICIAL FUNDING, AND TRUE UNIFICATION OF THIS RESEARCH COMMUNITY, THEY MOCKED THE IDEA IN EVERY WAY BY GIVING AN ABUNDANCE OF REASONS FOR WHY I WAS WAY OFF IN MY THINKING AND HOW SCIENCE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO LOOK INTO THIS.
AS IT TURNS OUT SOME OF THE CONTRIBUTORS TO THE GROUPS I WENT INTO TO INVESTIGATE ARE FULL OF PEOPLE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE BIGFOOT IS REAL, AND THAT CLEARLY HAVE AN AGENDA INVOLVING THE DERAILMENT OF ANY SERIOUS EFFORTS TO BRING THE TRUTH TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. IF YOU DOUBT THIS TRY DOING THE AMOUNT OF RESEARCH I HAVE INTO THIS AND YOU WILL SEE I AM CORRECT.
We must begin to identify what these real diversions are causing us. The promotion of scientific dependence is not the solution to our problems. Promoting that eyewitnesses are responsible to prove this and that we carry the "BURDEN OF PROOF" has already been counterproductive for many decades. THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE BLINDED TO THESE FACTS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT SOLUTION ORIENTED, THEY ARE CHAOS ORIENTED.
"NOT" seeking funding and active investigation from science as a whole is literally the Cause of all of this. SCIENCE -They lay the burrden of Proof" on what They Openly Call a FALSE SCIENCE, US... and they themselves are funding the discoveries of new elusive primates every year. Your evidence is invalid, not because it is invalid or not real, but because they did not find it in the first place. If you disagree with this you need to do more research on the matter, I have and as a result I am not Symbol or socially dependent.
Science can not have it both ways, this Flagrant misuse of presumed authority will be confronted.
Take a few minutes to think on the ridiculous implications of the paragraph above. This is the foundation of the dissolution of all the evidence we find and the primary cause of the cycle this research community is stuck in that has lasted for over 60 years. A symbol has been created to represent all of our evidence as "NOT REAL"
Terminology that precludes eyewitness statements
While science funds expeditions to catalog new species every year with these efforts grounded in slim or anecdotal evidence in the first place, the evidence for Bigfoot is "derogatorily termed" "Anecdotal" Like "Anecdotal" reference is never pursued and new species have never been found as a direct result of anecdotal evidence. For that matter, ALL science is anecdotal until it is proven. Go ahead, disagree with that, why would you in the first place, are you defending the same entity that is belittling you? are you symbol dependent? Do you blindly seek to say "here, see...It's real we told you!"
Like a dependent child, or are you an intelligent fully grown American?
Examine your self and our prior attempts as eyewitnesses and researchers and you'll find that this term has precluded the possibility of you being reliable or truthful in the descriptions of what you saw and what we all continue to say to the scientific community.
They can not have it both ways, this flagrant misuse of "Terminology" and presumed authority will be confronted
REALLY? DON'T EVEN GO THERE!
Don't even go there!
Symbols that make you think science as a whole is really interested in validation of what you know is real...Bigfoot -
Science searches for answers..on Monsterquest-all Bigfoot episodes are riddled with terminology that precludes validity despite the general serious tone of the show.
Finding Bigfoot, or As I like to call "Not Finding Bigfoot"
Ancient Aliens, the Bigfoot episode
Sasquatch, legend meets science
Bigfoot, the definitive guide
10,000,000 Dollar Bigfoot Bounty
These are a few examples of the programming you have viewed, but what have you absorbed psychologically by watching these shows? If you go back and watch them carefully you will see that they are all "Terministically Screened" to implement the Idea that Bigfoot is probably or most likely an ape of the non-human classification. Well, I am an eyewitness and I saw human facial features, yes his face was pre-human like, but definitely not ape-like.
Here are the symbols that make you think science is really trying to do something about validating Bigfoot when the reality is....they have no support from their colleagues and in fact are or have been in danger of losing their jobs because they chose to look into Bigfoot.
Jeff Meldrum....almost fired...University staff demanded he be stripped of tenure years ago
John Bindernagal...almost fired over Bigfoot research
Grover Crantz...almost fired...denied tenure
Ivan Sanderson...almost fired...denied tenure
The list goes on and on.
These people need our help and as of yet the research community has not addressed the real issues that are preventing real scientific investigation of the species, the very real suppressive bias that we are all subject to, especially a scientist that looks into Bigfoot. Haven't you ever wondered why nothing has been done about this? Well, it's because we have all absorbed these false symbols and they have rendered our community incapable of rational evaluation and action against the real responsible parties, mainstream science. Scientific Accountability to the American people needs to become a reality, and we want to help make that happen.
We cannot have scientists that are unscientific and biased ruining the careers of those scientists that are trying to be objective and examine the existence of this species. Quite frankly if you disagree with that, you should probably quit Bigfoot research altogether.
You may think that we need scientists to help us to confront science, and I believe that too...right now we have a Field Biologist and an Anthropologist, and 3 police officers who are all eyewitnesses including the scientists. Plain talk is how we will get this done.